Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince: Movie Review

Harry Potter and the Half-Blood PrinceThe sixth book in the saga of Harry Potter, Harry Potter and the Half Blood Prince is undoubtedly the one I liked the most: full of interesting events, not only it introduces the Horcruxes that will be so crucial in the last book, but it also take out of the picture a reference figure for Harry and his companions, it changes the character of Draco Malfoy for the worst, and above all it reveals the true (?) nature of another great character of the saga: Severus Snape. And so, you may ask, did I enjoy the film directed by David Yates in 2009 based on that book that I love so much? No, not really. Here’s why.

Perhaps it’s a matter of expectations: I expected the film to be as good as the book and instead… there’s no comparison between the two. Almost nothing remains of the emotions the book gave me, nor of its rich plot. It’s clear that the film aimed at telling only the story of Draco and his misdeeds (and it does so well), but everything else is simply forgotten. The unforgivable thing for me is the ending that betrays all we have come to know about Harry, an ending which comes out as emotion-less and cold despite the death of nothing less than Albus Dumbledore! Even the revelation of who’s the half-blood prince has no weight whatsoever and it leaves the viewer perplexed since the movie does nothing to highlight the importance of the prince’s book which is used by Harry in only a couple of scenes.

Even more than in the previous films, the absence of everyday school life here emerges as an unforgivable flaw as the film fails to adequately convey the shock of having Snape teaching Defense Against the Dark Arts. The same goes for Harry being suddenly very good at Potions, something he wasn’t before, and his consequent friendship with Professor Slughorn (Jim Broadbent).

I feel like a golden opportunity has been thrown away: with such a great source material, the movie feels like a mediocre job of an equally mediocre director. It doesn’t leave a lasting impression and it completely fails at creating what should have been the highest emotional peak of the whole saga! Yates had already wasted the death of Sirius Black in Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix, but here things are even worse with the scenes of Dumbledore’s death being absolutely mundane. So, after two successful movies by Chris Columbus (the philosopher’s stone and the chamber of secrets), the excellent third installment by Cuarón, Newell’s good fourth film, Yates’ arrival behind the camera is confirmed to have led to a brutal decline in quality which is evident in the weak fifth film and unfortunately also in this sixth one, perhaps better than the previous one (but with a decidedly worse ending), but still disappointing.

And speaking of the ending… are we really expected to belive that Harry, fully capable of moving and performing magic, could maintain control and do nothing to try to help his mentor about to be killed by the death eaters? In the book, Harry could do nothing because he was paralyzed! Instead, in the film version we have to believe in a Harry who holds back, keeps his instinct in check! This is not the character we know and love! I was hoping that a new vision would give me more and instead the opposite happened, I dislike the movie even more than before. And now let’s go ahead with the end of the saga broken up into two different films for reasons I don’t understand… But let’s talk about it in the next review, ciao!


External links:


6 risposte a "Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince: Movie Review"

  1. This one I liked more than Order of the Phoenix, but only marginally so. The stakes are much clearer, the evolution of the story too, the revelations about Voldemort’s past were nice, overall it flows better even though it’s rather monotonous, not many ups or downs. It’s the time when films started doing too much CGI and everything looks uniformly grey-blue-dark, nothing much stands out really. I understand it’s supposed to be more mature than the first films, but it doesn’t need to look like 2h30 of the look of the swamps where Sam and Frodo meet Gollum!

    There were a few things that were totally lost on me as a non-book reader. Why is it important that Snape is the Half-blood Prince? Who is that Prince, why half-blood? Prince of what? The climax also fell flat to me, with the death of Dumbledore. What I liked was actually all the parts with Jim Broadbent, and the nagging of the different students as they get involved in their various teenager love affairs! Still, not a great movie. Maybe book lovers get more out of these films just from the joy of seeing the visuals, and making connections that non-readers don’t know about.

    Piace a 1 persona

    1. I fully agree with you: I didn’t like the CGI effects either, but the cinematography is especially annoying (and would only get worse with the next movies in the series). Colours simply cease to exist in the HP universe, everything’s blue and grey… Why??? I don’t get it.

      As for your question, I totally understand that the movie alone doesn’t do much to help the viewer. Half blood is simply half wizard half muggle, something important for Voldemort and the Death Eaters. As for Prince, it was his mother’s maiden surname (she was called Eileen Prince).

      Why is it important… In the book, the importance of Snape’s potion book is huge, there are several instances in which Harry treats it as a true ally. Also, it helps Harry become a good wizards (not only for potions). So, in a sense, the reveal that the Half-Blood Prince is in fact a bad guy is fairly shocking in the book. This doesn’t come across at all in the movie. Also, the book is important for Harry to become part of Professor Slughorn’s inner circle and find out about the horcruxes. So, in a sense, Snape helps Harry through the book.
      But I would agree with you on the potions book not being the main element of the plot. Evidently J.K. Rowlinf thought otherwise! X–D

      Piace a 1 persona

      1. I got the meaning of half-blood through the movies, but not at all for Prince. I think Eileen Prince is not mentioned at all in the movies! So I was expecting some sort of reveal of prince being a Prince of Darkness!…

        Snape was ambiguous from the beginning, so even when he is “revealed” to be a bad guy you get the feeling that there’s still something he is hiding. During this movie, we know from the get go that he passed this vow for Draco. So you expect all the way to the end that he will betray Draco, which never happens. No, there are some things that are clear from the film, plot wise, but emotionally they don’t carry as much weight if you read the books I guess.

        Piace a 1 persona

      2. Totally: I think that the movies fall completely flat if you haven’t read the books which explain and develop more things and much more in depth!

        "Mi piace"

Rispondi

Inserisci i tuoi dati qui sotto o clicca su un'icona per effettuare l'accesso:

Logo di WordPress.com

Stai commentando usando il tuo account WordPress.com. Chiudi sessione /  Modifica )

Google photo

Stai commentando usando il tuo account Google. Chiudi sessione /  Modifica )

Foto Twitter

Stai commentando usando il tuo account Twitter. Chiudi sessione /  Modifica )

Foto di Facebook

Stai commentando usando il tuo account Facebook. Chiudi sessione /  Modifica )

Connessione a %s...